Illustrative
Figures on this screen are labeled sample data used to demonstrate the workspace. Live connectors are not yet configured.Map canvas awaiting a licensed provider
Tiles, attribution and geospatial queries (PostGIS) connect here. The workspace stays fully usable without the map: rankings, scorecards and comparison below are driven by the same data.
Source: Map provider not configured · —Data confidence: Insufficient
| Compare | Location | Weighted score | Indicative yield | Risk | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kiambu | 76 | 6.0% – 7.4% | Risk tier: Moderate risk | Data confidence: Moderate | |
| Machakos | 73 | 7.2% – 9.1% | Risk tier: Moderate risk | Data confidence: Moderate | |
| Mombasa | 64 | 5.4% – 7.0% | Risk tier: Elevated risk | Data confidence: Limited | |
| Kisumu | 62 | 6.5% – 8.2% | Risk tier: Elevated risk | Data confidence: Limited | |
| Uasin Gishu | 62 | 6.8% – 8.6% | Risk tier: Moderate risk | Data confidence: Limited |
Location scorecard — Ruiru
Every dimension shows its indicator score and weight. Change the weights to express your own thesis.
76/ 100
- Demand depth84 · weight 22%
- Affordability71 · weight 14%
- Access80 · weight 16%
- Projected infrastructure benefit76 · weight 14%
- Market momentum74 · weight 14%
- Regulatory feasibility68 · weight 12%
- Resilience70 · weight 8%
Observed demand drivers
- Commuter corridor with sustained household formation
- Expressway and bypass access to Nairobi employment nodes
- Active mid-market and affordable-housing pipeline
Data gaps
- Sub-county rental evidence is thin
- Sewer coverage data not licensed
Analyst conclusion (illustrative): Ruiru presents credible demand depth with a moderate feasibility burden. The score should not be read as a valuation or a recommendation; it summarises the evidence currently held on the platform.
Side-by-side comparison
Up to four locations. Empty cells state the gap rather than estimating a value.
| Dimension | Ruiru | Athi River |
|---|---|---|
| Demand depth | 84 | 70 |
| Affordability | 71 | 76 |
| Access | 80 | 82 |
| Projected infrastructure benefit | 76 | 79 |
| Market momentum | 74 | 68 |
| Regulatory feasibility | 68 | 66 |
| Resilience | 70 | 62 |
| Weighted score | 76 | 73 |
| Confidence | Data confidence: Moderate | Data confidence: Moderate |